Thursday, January 5, 2012
Androcenticism
emphasizing, or dominated by male or masculine interest." This means that
in a society the male’s opinion and views are used to describe the overall
general populations. Their actions are also used to exemplify both the male and
female behavior. The way that this description is used is a way to separate men
from women, most time when the women’s behavior deviates from the males they
are viewed as being inferior and out of the ordinary.
In the world today there are many different examples of Americans living unconsciously in an androcentric view of the world. This can be seen on many of the street signs, where most of the signs that we see have cartoon drawn pictures of men plastered on them. Some
example of these pictures can be seen on cross walks, pedestrian signs, and the
default avatars. Though it was found truer in children’s stories and television shows (http://androcentricworld.wordpress.com/), it was also
found that they are more focused around male characters whether their character
is the dominate or not. It is found that girls take up 25% of all animations. Though it is not obvious I do believe that we the in certain, not all, aspects of life the world that we live in has unconscious androcentric views. However, at the same time I do not believe that it is as drastic as the articles I read are trying to make it seem.
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Men's Movements
Thesaurus.com describes the men’s movements as “men’s attempt to redefine,” however, this seemingly simplistic sentence offers a variety of definitions.
There are two types of men undergoing a movement; those that want to return to the stereotypical alpha-male and those that want to be free to express themselves and be equal to women. In her article “Tracking the Men’s Movement” Marianna Torgovnick describes the movement of the men that wish to be seen as stereotypical males. Torgovnick illustrates the type of men that are viewed by the world as the alpha male; the man that is supposed to stand proud and provide for his family. Essentially the man that “wears the trousers.” This particular male’s movement is an attempt to redefine the conventional ways of the world and alter the success of the women’s movement. As a result of the women’s movement males lost some of their fundamental privileges, which they now hope to gain back. When women were granted the right to vote, work, and control their own lives conservative men lost their role. They were no longer viewed as the head of the house; their role in society had been completely altered. Their movement is an attempt to regain their dominance in the world and return to the “norm” that defines their clichéd identity.
However, Kenneth Clatterbaugh’s essay “Literature of the U.S. Men’s Movements,” illustrates the movement of the more liberal men. Following the success of the women’s movement there were men that wished to stray away from the image of the typical male. These men wanted to express their feelings and challenge the traditional roles that society had implanted upon them. These men wanted the freedom to be the men that they wished to be. They wanted to do things that society would typically frown upon. They wanted to express their sexuality, reveal their emotions, and even wear pink!
Third Wave Movement
Third Wave Feminism is loosely defined as "a philosophy that emerged in the 1990s, and focuses on the economic, political, social, and personal empowerment of women". In general, Third Wave Feminism is criticized for its lack of involvement in politics. The focus on identity issues is criticized because some people don’t consider it a universal concern. The Third Wave is slightly ambiguous due to the fact that there has yet to be a legal achievement or formalized goal associated with it, like the right to vote or even reproductive rights. Overall, Third Wave Feminism pulls away from activism and centers on the philosophy of individual empowerment, and moves to improve the lives of women in every aspect of life.
Queer
While the classic definition of queer as stated by dictionary.com is "strange or odd from a conventional viewpoint", this is no longer the way the word is used in modern context. More recently, queer has be adapted as an "umbrella" term from the LGBTIQ community. The UC Berkeley Gender Equity and LGBT Resource Center defines queer as "An umbrella term to refer to all LGBTIQ people; a political statement, as well as a sexual orientation, which advocates breaking binary thinking and seeing both sexual orientation and gender identity as potentially fluid". This modern day, working definition is affirmed by the BGSU Queer Glossary, "queer is a term which has been reclaimed by members of the gay, lesbian. bisexual, and transgender communities to refer to people who transgress culturally imposed norms of heterosexuality and gender traditionalism. Queer might be broadly defined as resistance to regimes of the “normal.”". Based on the UC Berkely and the BGSU definitions, one can define queer as an all-encompassing term for sexual minorities that are not heteronormative and/or do not follow the gender-binary.
Essentialism (in context of gender)
In my findings the idea and connotations of essentialism have been frequently debated, specifically in the context of gender. In general, essentialism is making a sweeping statement that the all members of a specific group must share some similar qualities in order to pertain to that group. What these similar qualites are for each defined group vary from person to person. From my findings, I found that specific groups (for example, feminists) change the stance they take to gender essentialism according to context. For example, in “Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism in Feminist Theory”, feminists denounce the essentialist idea that there is no biological evidence that supports only two categories for humans as male or female, and thus gender essentialism is not validated.
However interestingly enough, although essentialism implies concrete traits, the level of gender essentialism accepted varies from group to group. As the British Psychological Society explains, the use of essentialism is not always present in society but rather people’s desire to adhere to this essentialism is most present when there chance for change. It even hints that even sometimes, groups use the ideas of essentialism (the idea that there is a commonality between the members) to prove that other aspects of their groups are different. Thus ironically essentialism is almost used to disprove essentialism. I think this demonstrates that ultimately essentialism, which is supposed to be a rigid and innate quality, is actually very malleable, depending on context and interpretation.
Second Wave Feminism
Gender Identity
Intersex
Sources: The Organization Intersex International US: http://oiiusa.org/what_is_intersex
The Intersex Society of North America: http://www.isna.org/faq/what_is_intersex
The MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001669.htm
Transgender
Gender
Masculine
Heterosexual
Feminine
While I think that both of these definitions are not necessarily wrong, I do not support such a construct. The point of femininity is to define women, to teach them how to be, regardless of what they want. I think that the term feminine is an outdated term that serves no actual purpose to modern society. Additionally, while I appreciate the candidness and straightforwardness of Brainy Quote, I do not believe that it should be something encouraged nowadays. Similar to our points of view, we must make our everyday language progressive to the times, especially considering the impact of gender labels. As of Y2K, feminine has become a dirty word, something that is spoken out of hate as opposed to a compliment that it was developed as. While once girls strived to be described as feminine, it has now become a word synonymous exclusively with “weak” or “dependent”, providing a negative image to both genders. I think that our generation either has to redefine the term again to simply mean a characteristic, or cease using the term whatsoever.
Heterosexism
Though perhaps it is a less credible source, I actually agree more with an Urban Dictionary definition of heterosexism: "The false assumption that everyone is or should be heterosexual because it is assumed to be the only acceptable and viable life option; this assumption often leads to discrimination based on sexual orientation; a form of homophobia." Though this definition is not bias-free and is somewhat less concise than that of Dictionary.com, I prefer it because it does not assume that only heterosexuals can participate in heterosexism. In fact, I agree with Wikipedia's discussion of the term which states, "people of any sexual orientation can hold such attitudes [of heterosexism] and bias."
Currently, there is a pending act in congress, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would forbid any discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in the workplace. If this act is passed it would help to fight against heterosexism, but the fact that it is still pending shows that heterosexism is still a huge problem in the United States.
Homosexual
Wikipedia defines homosexuality as "a romantic or sexual attraction between members of the same sex or gender".
My third source was an article written by Dr. Paul Cameron, titled "What Causes Homosexual Desire and Can It Be Changed?" In the article, Dr. Cameron explains the cause of homosexuality based on factual evidence. He determines that homosexuality is "learned". He offers seven pieces of evidence in support of his claim, most of which explain that homosexuality happens at a younger age, becuase younger people are more easily influenced. He also believes that homosexuality can be changed based off of evidence that there are 'ex-homosexuals". He believes that the best way to "eliminate" homosexual behaviour is that "those with homosexual desires need to descipline themselves and abstain from homosexual contact".
Personally, I believe that homosexuality is a choice. Sure, it can be influenced by events at a younger age, but it all boils down to the person making their own choice about their own life. I also believe that we should not try to eliminate homosexuality, but homosexuals should not force their way of life on others and try to influence younger people into becoming homosexuals.
Sexual Orientation
2. Berkley University LGBT Resources: "The deep-seated direction of one's sexual (erotic) attraction. It is on a continuum and not a set of absolute categories...sexual orientation evolves through a multistage developmental process, and may change over time."
3. NSCU: "The affectional or loving attraction to another person. It can be considered as raning along a continuum from same sex attraction only at one end of the continuum to opposite sex attraction only at the other end."
It should be noted that many sources discussed a widespread confusion about what constitute sexusal orientation. Is it a behavior? A psychology? A combination? Is it developed? Inate? A combination? Is attraction enough to comprise orientation? Are actual sexual acts necessary? Is experiencing the feeling of love requisite? Many were unwilling to offer a definition and leave it at that. Multiple sources struggled also with the terminology used to describe sexual orientation. Homosexual and heterosexual were often deemed insufficient.
I feel most comfortable with the idea of the sliding scale:
{Same Sex Only}------------------------{Both Sexes}-----------------------{Opposite Sex Only}
This system provides for the idea that one might fall somewhere in between the defined options.
The part of this definition that I find most troubling is what actually constitutes an individuals position on the scale. Does the scale measure merely feelings of attraction or are deeper romantic tendancies here constituted? The two ideas are difficult enough to disentangle in the first place.
Gender Terminology Posting Instructions
Cite any electronic sources you have by linking to them. For instance, you might write, "The Oxford English Dictionary defines androcentrism in the following way..." If you're using any books, create a little Works Cited entry at the end of your post and use parenthetical citation for any references you make to that book.
If you feel like your sources aren't going to cut it, feel free to investigate further online or in the library, within the time limits.
The title of your post should simply be your term. Make sure you label your post "terminology" in the labels section at the bottom.
Enjoy!